Why are there different perspectives on change within organisations Essay

Why are there different perspectives on change within organisations - Essay Example Why are there different perspectives on change within organisations? The paper has answered the research question of Why are there different perspectives on change within organisations?". After giving a brief overview of stakeholders it was seen that the perspectives change as per the impact on the stakeholders. It is expected that each entity would have a different view or a perspective on the change management. This paper would attempt to answer the theThe paper has answered the research question of Why are there different perspectives on change within organisations?". After giving a brief overview of stakeholders it was seen that the perspectives change as per the impact on the stakeholders. When the interests of stakeholders are different, their perspectives and interest in the change management process would be different. Three case studies using the above reasoning have been examined. From the study, it emerges that a change management process is successful only when differing perspectives, needs and interests of various stakeholders are conside red. Two case studies of change management process during the merger of multinational automobile firms have been examined. It has been seen that in the case of Daimler Chrysler, differing perspectives of the stakeholders were not resolved and controlled by a proper change management process. As a result there was intense suspicion and infighting thus leading to a failure of the merger. In the second case of an alliance between Renault and Nissan was examined.

Liturgy and the Microphone Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Liturgy and the Microphone - Coursework Example Experience would tell me that an effective sermon touches certain domains of the mind and the heart and provokes past as well as present personal issues. These issues may refer to encounters of pain, happiness, or grief. Most of all, they refer to matters pertaining to spirituality and how it can be strengthened. Eliot describes such a phenomenon as the workings of the â€Å"auditory imagination† in which the mind seems to travel back in time and results in a merging of earlier and current times (qtd. in Mcluhan 107). As the words lull in the distance, a kind of progression takes place especially when the message is relevant to what has happened or what is presently happening in the person’s life. The microphone then is like an instrument in neuro-linguistic programming that is often used as a therapeutic intervention to deal with various psychological problems. By listening to a psychotherapist, the person is being guided to a particular place in his consciousness that will give him access to personal issues and gradually attempt to resolve them in the same plane. However, the depth of mental and emotional processing that will take place is still dependent on the listener’s willingness to focus on what is being said. If the person is not really interested in the message or is too distracted by other thoughts to allow anything else to sink in, the volume and quality of the sound produced through the microphone will not matter to any extent. As such, the microphone may involve a public address system during the mass, but the overall experience in consciousness is still private and individual. Similarly, I disagree with Mcluhan’s contention that the use of the vernacular pace through the microphone discourages meditation unlike what is happening during a relaxed Latin Mass (Mcluhan 110). Among all the church goers, only a few could comprehend Latin and cannot start then to